Inter-relação entre Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans e os tratamentos endodônticos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24863/rib.v9i1.87Abstract
Os insucessos dos tratamentos endodônticos estão associados, em parte, à presença de uma microbiota resistente, sendo a bactéria mais recorrente, o Enterococcus faecalis, e Candida albicans o principal fungo isolado dos canais radiculares. Nesta revisão, foram coletados dados sobre insucessos no tratamento endodôntico, em face da resistência da E. faecalis, C. albicans, biofilme, no período de Junho de 2016 a Fevereiro de 2017, com uma pesquisa qualitativa, descritiva e analítica de artigos científicos, em periódicos indexados nas bases de dados: Scielo e PUBMED. A anatomia interna dos dentes com seus sistemas de canais radiculares e a presença dos canalículos nas suas paredes, conjugados à formação do biofilme, aumentam os mecanismos de virulência dos microrganismos, dificultando a ação tanto do sistema imunológico, como das substâncias antimicrobianas, contribuindo para o fracasso nos tratamentos endodônticos, haja vista a dificuldade de alcançar a sanificação dos canais radiculares. Essa revisão de literatura tem o escopo de traçar a inter-relação entre o insucesso endodôntico e a presença do Enterococcus faecalis e Candida albicans, por terem mecanismos resistentes ao tratamento endodôntico.Palavras-chaves: Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, biofilme, insucessos endodônticos.
References
1. Estrela C, Holland R, Estrela CRDA, AlencarAHG, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD. (2014). Characterization of successful root canal treatment. Brazilian dental journal, 25(1), 3-11.
Sunde PT, Olsen I, Debelian GJ, Tronstad L (2002). Microbiota of periapical lesions refractory to endodontic therapy. Journal of Endodontics, 28 (4), 304-310.
2. Moghaddam AS, Radafshar G, TaramsariM,Darabi F.(2014). Long‐termsurvival rate of teeth receiving multidisciplinary endodontic, periodontal and prosthodontic treatments. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 41(3), 236-242.
3. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren, U.(1998). Microbiologic analysis of teeth with faile dendodontic treatment and the outcome of conservativere-treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, andEndodontology, 85(1), 86-93.
4. Evans M, Davies JK, SundqvistG, Figdor, D. (2002). Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. International Endodontic Journal, 35(3), 221-228.
5. Souza LC, Brito PR, De OliveiraJCM, Alves FR., Moreira EJ, Sampaio-Filho HR, ... & SiqueiraJF. (2010). Photodynamic therapy with two different photosensitizers as a supplementto instrumentation/irrigation procedures in promotingintracanal reduction of Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Endodontics, 36(2), 292-296.
6. Santi BTD, Ribeiro MB, Endo MS, De Almeida Gomes BPF. (2015). Avaliação da suscetibilidade antimicrobiana de bactérias anaeróbias facultativas isoladas de canais radiculares de dentes com insucesso endodôntico frente aos antibióticos de uso sistêmico. Rev Odontol UNESP, 44(4), 200-206.
7. Siqueira JF, Lopes HP. (1999). Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. International Endodontic Journal, 32(5), 361-369.
8. Ashraf, H., Samiee, M., Eslami, G., & Hosseini, M. R. G. (2007). Presence of Candida albicans in root canal system of teeth requiring endodontic retreatment with and without periapical lesions. Iranian endodontic journal, 2(1),
9. Safavi KE, Spngberg LS, Langeland K. (1990). Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection. Journal of Endodontics,16(5), 207-210.
10. Cruz MR, Graham CE, Gagliano BC, Lorenz MC, Garsin DA. (2013). Enterococcus faecalis inhibits hyphal morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. Infectionandimmunity, 81(1), 189-200.
11. Baumgartner JC, Watts CM, Xia T. (2000). Occurrence of Candida albicans in infections of endodontic origin. Journal of endodontics, 26(12), 695-698.
12. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. (2007). Antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. International endodontic journal, 40(1), 2-10.
13. Love RM. (2001). Enterococcus faecalis–a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. International endodontic journal, 34(5), 399-405.
14. Zoletti GO, Siqueira JF, Santos KRN. (2006). Identification of Enterococcus faecalis in Root-filled Teeth With or Without Periradicular Lesions by Culture-dependentand—Independent Approaches. Journal of endodontics, 32(8), 722-726.
15. De Oliveira AA, Scelza MFZ, De Souza PintoS, De Mattos Guaraldi AL, Júnior RH. (2011). Isolamento e identificação de Enterococcus sp em infecções endodônticas primárias. Revistas, 68(1), 20.
16. Holland R, Scares IJ, Scares IM. (1992). Influence of irrigation and intracanal dressing on the healing process of dogs’ teeth with apical periodontitis. Dental Traumatology, 8(6), 223-229.
17. Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, Rimondini L, Morra M. (2006). Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic. Journal of Endodontics, 32(11), 1091-1093.
18. Wang CS, Arnold RR, Trope M, Teixeira FB. (2007). Clinical efficiency of 2% chlorhexidine gel in reducing intracanal bacteria. Journal of endodontics, 33(11), 1283-1289.
19. Sabrah AH, Yassen GH, Gregory RL. (2013). Effectiveness of antibiotic medicaments against biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Journal of endodontics, 39(11), 1385-1389.
20. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. (1999). Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science, 284(5418), 1318-1322.
21. Costerton B. (2004). Microbial ecology comes of age and joins the general ecology community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(49), 16983-16984.
22. Mohammadi Z, Palazzi F, Giardino L, Shalavi S. (2013). Microbial biofilms in endodontic infections: an update review. Biomedical journal, 36(2), 59.
23. Sen BH, Piskin B, Demirci T. (1995). Observation of bacteria and fungi in infected root canals and dentinal tubules by SEM. Dental Traumatology, 11(1), 6-9.
24. De BruckerK, Tan Y, Vints K, De Cremer K, Braem A, Verstraeten N, Thevissen K. (2015). Fungal β-1, 3-glucan increases ofloxacin tolerance of Escherichia coli in a polymicrobial E. coli/ Candidaalbicans biofilm. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 59(6), 3052-3058.
25. Kishen A, George S, Kumar R. (2006). Enterococcus faecalis‐mediated biomineralized biofilm formation on root canal dentine in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 77(2), 406-415.
26. Cogo DM. Potencialização da ação do hidróxido de cálcio pelo inibidor da bomba de prótons omeprazol sobre o Enterococcus faecalis [dissertação]. Rio Grande do Sul: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul: 2012.
Sunde PT, Olsen I, Debelian GJ, Tronstad L (2002). Microbiota of periapical lesions refractory to endodontic therapy. Journal of Endodontics, 28 (4), 304-310.
2. Moghaddam AS, Radafshar G, TaramsariM,Darabi F.(2014). Long‐termsurvival rate of teeth receiving multidisciplinary endodontic, periodontal and prosthodontic treatments. Journal of oral rehabilitation, 41(3), 236-242.
3. Sundqvist G, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren, U.(1998). Microbiologic analysis of teeth with faile dendodontic treatment and the outcome of conservativere-treatment. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, andEndodontology, 85(1), 86-93.
4. Evans M, Davies JK, SundqvistG, Figdor, D. (2002). Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. International Endodontic Journal, 35(3), 221-228.
5. Souza LC, Brito PR, De OliveiraJCM, Alves FR., Moreira EJ, Sampaio-Filho HR, ... & SiqueiraJF. (2010). Photodynamic therapy with two different photosensitizers as a supplementto instrumentation/irrigation procedures in promotingintracanal reduction of Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Endodontics, 36(2), 292-296.
6. Santi BTD, Ribeiro MB, Endo MS, De Almeida Gomes BPF. (2015). Avaliação da suscetibilidade antimicrobiana de bactérias anaeróbias facultativas isoladas de canais radiculares de dentes com insucesso endodôntico frente aos antibióticos de uso sistêmico. Rev Odontol UNESP, 44(4), 200-206.
7. Siqueira JF, Lopes HP. (1999). Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. International Endodontic Journal, 32(5), 361-369.
8. Ashraf, H., Samiee, M., Eslami, G., & Hosseini, M. R. G. (2007). Presence of Candida albicans in root canal system of teeth requiring endodontic retreatment with and without periapical lesions. Iranian endodontic journal, 2(1),
9. Safavi KE, Spngberg LS, Langeland K. (1990). Root canal dentinal tubule disinfection. Journal of Endodontics,16(5), 207-210.
10. Cruz MR, Graham CE, Gagliano BC, Lorenz MC, Garsin DA. (2013). Enterococcus faecalis inhibits hyphal morphogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. Infectionandimmunity, 81(1), 189-200.
11. Baumgartner JC, Watts CM, Xia T. (2000). Occurrence of Candida albicans in infections of endodontic origin. Journal of endodontics, 26(12), 695-698.
12. Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer H. (2007). Antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. International endodontic journal, 40(1), 2-10.
13. Love RM. (2001). Enterococcus faecalis–a mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. International endodontic journal, 34(5), 399-405.
14. Zoletti GO, Siqueira JF, Santos KRN. (2006). Identification of Enterococcus faecalis in Root-filled Teeth With or Without Periradicular Lesions by Culture-dependentand—Independent Approaches. Journal of endodontics, 32(8), 722-726.
15. De Oliveira AA, Scelza MFZ, De Souza PintoS, De Mattos Guaraldi AL, Júnior RH. (2011). Isolamento e identificação de Enterococcus sp em infecções endodônticas primárias. Revistas, 68(1), 20.
16. Holland R, Scares IJ, Scares IM. (1992). Influence of irrigation and intracanal dressing on the healing process of dogs’ teeth with apical periodontitis. Dental Traumatology, 8(6), 223-229.
17. Giardino L, Ambu E, Becce C, Rimondini L, Morra M. (2006). Surface tension comparison of four common root canal irrigants and two new irrigants containing antibiotic. Journal of Endodontics, 32(11), 1091-1093.
18. Wang CS, Arnold RR, Trope M, Teixeira FB. (2007). Clinical efficiency of 2% chlorhexidine gel in reducing intracanal bacteria. Journal of endodontics, 33(11), 1283-1289.
19. Sabrah AH, Yassen GH, Gregory RL. (2013). Effectiveness of antibiotic medicaments against biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Journal of endodontics, 39(11), 1385-1389.
20. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. (1999). Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science, 284(5418), 1318-1322.
21. Costerton B. (2004). Microbial ecology comes of age and joins the general ecology community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(49), 16983-16984.
22. Mohammadi Z, Palazzi F, Giardino L, Shalavi S. (2013). Microbial biofilms in endodontic infections: an update review. Biomedical journal, 36(2), 59.
23. Sen BH, Piskin B, Demirci T. (1995). Observation of bacteria and fungi in infected root canals and dentinal tubules by SEM. Dental Traumatology, 11(1), 6-9.
24. De BruckerK, Tan Y, Vints K, De Cremer K, Braem A, Verstraeten N, Thevissen K. (2015). Fungal β-1, 3-glucan increases ofloxacin tolerance of Escherichia coli in a polymicrobial E. coli/ Candidaalbicans biofilm. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 59(6), 3052-3058.
25. Kishen A, George S, Kumar R. (2006). Enterococcus faecalis‐mediated biomineralized biofilm formation on root canal dentine in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 77(2), 406-415.
26. Cogo DM. Potencialização da ação do hidróxido de cálcio pelo inibidor da bomba de prótons omeprazol sobre o Enterococcus faecalis [dissertação]. Rio Grande do Sul: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul: 2012.
Downloads
Published
2017-11-27
Issue
Section
ARTIGO DE REVISÃO
